Ln 914 Community Responder
Responds to unanswered GitHub discussions and issues with codebase-informed replies. Use when clearing community question backlog.
MCP get_skill({ skillId: "ln-914-community-responder-caff1646" })Use this skill with your agent
Create a free account and connect via MCP
> **Paths:** File paths (`references/`, `../ln-*`) are relative to this skill directory.
# ln-914-community-responder
**Type:** L3 Worker (standalone)
**Category:** 9XX Community Engagement
Responds to unanswered GitHub Discussions and Issues by analyzing the question, searching the codebase for answers, and composing a helpful reply. Supports single-item and batch modes.
---
## Overview
| Aspect | Details |
|--------|---------|
| **Input** | `$ARGUMENTS`: discussion/issue number (`#42`), `batch` (all unanswered P1), or empty (interactive) |
| **Output** | Response comment(s) published to GitHub |
| **Pattern** | Read question → Search codebase → Compose response → Fact-check → Publish |
---
## Phase 0: GitHub Discovery
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `references/community_github_discovery.md`
Execute the discovery protocol. Extract:
- `{owner}/{repo}` for URLs and API calls
- `repo.id` for GraphQL mutations
- `maintainer` login (authenticated user)
- Discussion category IDs
Load strategy: check `docs/community_engagement_strategy.md` in target project, fallback to `references/community_strategy_template.md`. Extract Section 5 (Engagement Metrics) and Section 6 (Tone Guide).
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `references/community_discussion_formatting.md`
**MANDATORY READ:** Load [response_styles.md](references/response_styles.md)
**MANDATORY READ:** Load `references/humanizer_checklist.md`
---
## Phase 1: Load Items
### Single Item Mode
If `$ARGUMENTS` contains a number (e.g., `42`, `#42`):
```bash
# For discussions
gh api graphql -f query='query($owner: String!, $name: String!) {
repository(owner: $owner, name: $name) {
discussion(number: {N}) {
id number title body
category { name }
author { login }
createdAt
answerChosenAt
comments(first: 20) {
totalCount
nodes { author { login } body createdAt }
}
}
}
}' -f owner="{owner}" -f name="{repo}"
```
```bash
# For issues (if discussion not found)
gh issue view {N} --repo {owner}/{repo} --json number,title,body,author,createdAt,comments,labels
```
### Batch Mode
If `$ARGUMENTS` is `batch`:
1. Fetch recent discussions + issues via GraphQL (last 30 days, open, sorted by created DESC)
2. Filter to P1 items: author != maintainer AND zero maintainer comments
3. Fetch full context for each item (max 10 per batch)
### Interactive Mode
If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty, list recent unanswered items and ask the user which to respond to.
---
## Phase 2: Analyze Context
For each item:
### 2a. Understand the Question
1. Read the discussion/issue body — identify the core question or problem
2. Read existing comments — check if partially answered or if follow-ups changed the scope
3. Detect item type: Q&A question, bug report, feature request, configuration help, general feedback
### 2b. Search Codebase for Answer
Based on the question type, search for relevant information:
| Question Type | Search Strategy |
|---------------|----------------|
| "How do I..." | Grep for keywords in SKILL.md files, README.md, docs/ |
| Bug report | Grep for mentioned function/file, check git log for recent fixes |
| Configuration | Read .hex-skills/environment_state.json, CLAUDE.md, relevant SKILL.md |
| Feature request | Check if feature already exists, grep for related patterns |
| Installation | Read README.md installation section, plugin.json |
```
FOR each item:
1. Extract keywords from question (function names, skill names, error messages)
2. Grep codebase for keywords (max 5 searches)
3. Read relevant files (max 3 files, prioritize SKILL.md and docs/)
4. Check git log for recent changes related to the topic
5. If answer found → proceed to Phase 3
6. If not found → mark as "needs-manual" and suggest the user respond directly
```
### 2c. Detect First-Time Poster
```bash
gh api graphql -f query='query($owner: String!, $name: String!) {
repository(owner: $owner, name: $name) {
discussions(first: 100) {
nodes { author { login } }
}
}
}' -f owner="{owner}" -f name="{repo}"
```
Count how many discussions the author has created. If 0 previous (this is their first) → flag for Welcome style.
---
## Phase 3: Classify Response Type
**MANDATORY READ:** Load [response_styles.md](references/response_styles.md) — use the classification matrix.
| Item Type | Response Style |
|-----------|---------------|
| Q&A question with answer found | **Technical Answer** |
| Bug report | **Bug Acknowledgment** |
| Feature request / idea | **Feature Acknowledgment** |
| Question already answered elsewhere | **Redirect** |
| First-time poster (any type) | **Welcome** + appropriate content style |
| Stale item with progress update | **Status Update** |
| Cannot find answer in codebase | Mark `needs-manual` — skip composition |
---
## Phase 4: Compose Response
Use the selected style template from `response_styles.md`.
### Required Elements (All Styles)
- **Thank the author** — by name if possible, acknowledge their contribution
- **Answer the question** — direct, clear, linked to source code/docs
- **Invite follow-up** — "Let us know if this helps" or similar
- **No jargon without context** — explain internal terms
- **Link to code** — at least one link to relevant file in the repo
### Batch Mode Composition
In batch mode, compose all responses first, then present ALL for user review before publishing any.
---
## Phase 5: Fact-Check
Before presenting to user, verify every claim:
1. **File paths & links** — verify each linked file exists: `ls {path}`
2. **Code references** — verify mentioned functions/classes exist: `grep -r "{name}"`
3. **Feature descriptions** — re-read source file, confirm accuracy
4. **Install/usage commands** — verify against README.md
5. **Humanizer audit** -- run the audit protocol from `humanizer_checklist.md`. If 3+ AI patterns found, rewrite flagged sections.
**Gate:** If any check fails, fix the response before proceeding.
---
## Phase 6: Review and Publish
### Single Item Mode
Present the composed response to the user. **Wait for explicit approval before publishing.**
### Batch Mode
Present ALL responses in a summary table:
```
### Batch Responses — {N} items
| # | Type | Title | Style | Status |
|---|------|-------|-------|--------|
| {number} | {Discussion/Issue} | {title} | {Technical/Bug/Welcome/...} | Ready |
| {number} | ... | ... | ... | needs-manual |
```
Then show each response body. User can approve all, approve selectively, or edit individual responses.
### Publish Discussion Comment
```bash
gh api graphql -f query='
mutation($discussionId: ID!, $body: String!) {
addDiscussionComment(input: {
discussionId: $discussionId,
body: $body
}) {
comment { url }
}
}
' -f discussionId="{discussion.id}" -f body="{response body}"
```
### Publish Issue Comment
```bash
gh issue comment {number} --repo {owner}/{repo} --body "{response body}"
```
Report the comment URL(s) to the user.
---
## Rules
- **Always require user approval** before publishing any response
- **Never close** discussions or issues — only respond
- **Never mark as answered** — let the author do it (for Q&A discussions)
- **Batch limit:** max 10 items per batch (prevent context overload)
- **needs-manual items:** report to user with GitHub URL + reason, do not attempt response
- **Tone:** per strategy Section 6 — respectful, helpful, link to code
---
## Definition of Done
- [ ] Items loaded (single, batch, or interactive selection)
- [ ] Question context analyzed + codebase searched for answers
- [ ] Response type classified per response_styles.md
- [ ] First-time posters detected and welcomed
- [ ] Response(s) composed with links to relevant code/docs
- [ ] Fact-checked (file paths, code references, commands verified)
- [ ] User approved response(s)
- [ ] Published via GraphQL/CLI, comment URL(s) reported
- [ ] needs-manual items reported to user with URLs
---
**Version:** 1.0.0
**Last Updated:** 2026-03-14Related Skills
More skills in Business, Marketing & Sales
Ab Testing
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program," or "experiment playbook." Use this whenever someone is comparing two approaches and wants to measure which performs better, or when they want to build a systematic experimentation practice. For tracking implementation, see analytics. For page-level conversion optimization, see cro.
Ab Test Setup
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "conversion experiment," "statistical significance," or "test this." For tracking implementation, see analytics-tracking.
Ab Test Setup
Ab Test Setup linked from Corey Haines marketing skills, with the upstream skill instructions available on GitHub.
Ab Test Store Listing
When the user wants to A/B test App Store product page elements to improve conversion rate. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test", "product page optimization", "test my screenshots", "test my icon", "conversion rate optimization", "CPP", or "custom product pages". For screenshot design, see screenshot-optimization. For metadata optimization, see metadata-optimization.
Account Research
Research a company or person and get actionable sales intel. Works standalone with web search, supercharged when you connect enrichment tools or your CRM. Trigger with "research [company]", "look up [person]", "intel on [prospect]", "who is [name] at [company]", or "tell me about [company]".
Account Research
Research a company using Common Room data. Triggers on 'research [company]', 'tell me about [domain]', 'pull up signals for [account]', 'what's going on with [company]', or any account-level question.
Explore Other Categories
Skills from other categories with shared topics
Ln 210 Epic Coordinator
Creates or replans 3-7 Epics from scope using Decompose-First pattern. Use when initiative needs Epic-level breakdown or Epic scope changed.
Ln 300 Task Coordinator
Analyzes Story and builds optimal task plan (1-8 tasks), then routes to create or replan. Use when Story needs task breakdown or replanning.
Ln 401 Task Executor
Executes implementation tasks through Todo, In Progress, To Review. Use when task needs coding with KISS/YAGNI. Not for test tasks.