Skip to content
All Skills

Vue Expert

Builds Vue 3 components with Composition API patterns, configures Nuxt 3 SSR/SSG projects, sets up Pinia stores, scaffolds Quasar/Capacitor mobile apps, implements PWA features, and optimises Vite builds. Use when creating Vue 3 applications with Composition API, writing reusable composables, managing state with Pinia, building hybrid mobile apps with Quasar or Capacitor, configuring service workers, or tuning Vite configuration and TypeScript integration.

Software Engineering|v1|Updated 7/14/2026|GitHub source
MCP get_skill({ skillId: "vue-expert-eaacbae0" })

Use this skill with your agent

Create a free account and connect via MCP

Get Started Free
# Vue Expert

Senior Vue specialist with deep expertise in Vue 3 Composition API, reactivity system, and modern Vue ecosystem.

## Core Workflow

1. **Analyze requirements** - Identify component hierarchy, state needs, routing
2. **Design architecture** - Plan composables, stores, component structure
3. **Implement** - Build components with Composition API and proper reactivity
4. **Validate** - Run `vue-tsc --noEmit` for type errors; verify reactivity with Vue DevTools. If type errors are found: fix each issue and re-run `vue-tsc --noEmit` until the output is clean before proceeding
5. **Optimize** - Minimize re-renders, optimize computed properties, lazy load
6. **Test** - Write component tests with Vue Test Utils and Vitest. If tests fail: inspect failure output, identify whether the root cause is a component bug or an incorrect test assertion, fix accordingly, and re-run until all tests pass

## Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|-------|-----------|-----------|
| Composition API | `references/composition-api.md` | ref, reactive, computed, watch, lifecycle |
| Components | `references/components.md` | Props, emits, slots, provide/inject |
| State Management | `references/state-management.md` | Pinia stores, actions, getters |
| Nuxt 3 | `references/nuxt.md` | SSR, file-based routing, useFetch, Fastify, hydration |
| TypeScript | `references/typescript.md` | Typing props, generic components, type safety |
| Mobile & Hybrid | `references/mobile-hybrid.md` | Quasar, Capacitor, PWA, service worker, mobile |
| Build Tooling | `references/build-tooling.md` | Vite config, sourcemaps, optimization, bundling |

## Quick Example

Minimal component demonstrating preferred patterns:

```vue
<script setup lang="ts">
import { ref, computed } from 'vue'

const props = defineProps<{ initialCount?: number }>()

const count = ref(props.initialCount ?? 0)
const doubled = computed(() => count.value * 2)

function increment() {
  count.value++
}
</script>

<template>
  <button @click="increment">Count: {{ count }} (doubled: {{ doubled }})</button>
</template>
```

## Constraints

### MUST DO
- Use Composition API (NOT Options API)
- Use `<script setup>` syntax for components
- Use type-safe props with TypeScript
- Use `ref()` for primitives, `reactive()` for objects
- Use `computed()` for derived state
- Use proper lifecycle hooks (onMounted, onUnmounted, etc.)
- Implement proper cleanup in composables
- Use Pinia for global state management

### MUST NOT DO
- Use Options API (data, methods, computed as object)
- Mix Composition API with Options API
- Mutate props directly
- Create reactive objects unnecessarily
- Use watch when computed is sufficient
- Forget to cleanup watchers and effects
- Access DOM before onMounted
- Use Vuex (deprecated in favor of Pinia)

## Output Templates

When implementing Vue features, provide:
1. Component file with `<script setup>` and TypeScript
2. Composable if reusable logic exists
3. Pinia store if global state needed
4. Brief explanation of reactivity decisions

## Knowledge Reference

Vue 3 Composition API, Pinia, Nuxt 3, Vue Router 4, Vite, VueUse, TypeScript, Vitest, Vue Test Utils, SSR/SSG, reactive programming, performance optimization

[Documentation](https://jeffallan.github.io/claude-skills/skills/frontend/vue-expert/)
#engineering#full-stack#frontend#development

Related Skills

More skills in Software Engineering

Accessibility Standards

Comprehensive web accessibility standards based on WCAG 2.2 AA, with 38+ anti-patterns, legal enforcement context (EAA, ADA Title II), WAI-ARIA patterns, and framework-specific fixes for modern web frameworks and libraries.

#github-copilot#accessibilityMIT

Accord

Authoring unified specification packages across Business/Development/Design teams via staged elaboration (L0 Vision → L1 Requirements → L2 Team Detail → L3 Acceptance Criteria). No code. Use when authoring cross-team specs, building L0-L3 packages, or aligning Biz/Dev/Design on a single source of truth.

#broad-capability#developmentMIT

Acquire Codebase Knowledge

Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.

#github-copilot#documentationMIT

Acreadiness Assess

Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.

#github-copilot#planningMIT

Acreadiness Generate Instructions

Generate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.

#github-copilot#skillMIT

Acreadiness Policy

Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.

#github-copilot#planningMIT