Validation
Use after creating or modifying ANY Honeydew object (metric, attribute, entity, domain). Provides type-specific validation logic to ensure objects work correctly and return sensible results.
MCP get_skill({ skillId: "validation-77bac709" })Use this skill with your agent
Create a free account and connect via MCP
## Overview **This skill is MANDATORY after creating or modifying any Honeydew object.** Validation ensures: - The object compiles and executes without errors - Results are returned (not NULL or empty) - Values make business sense - Related objects are consistent with each other --- ## Validation by Object Type ### Metrics **Step 1: Execute the metric** Call `get_data_from_fields` with: - `metrics`: `["<entity>.<metric_name>"]` If the tool call fails (API error, permission denied, timeout), report the error to the user before proceeding. Do not confuse a tool error with suspicious data. **Step 2: Sanity checks** | Check | What to Look For | Action if Failed | | --------------- | ------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | | Returns data | Not NULL, not empty | Check SQL syntax, entity references | | Magnitude | Reasonable for business context | Verify calculation logic | | Sign | Positive for revenue/counts (usually) | Check for inverted logic | | Related metrics | Parts sum to whole | Query related metrics together and verify consistency | | Ratios | Between 0-100% (usually) | Check numerator and denominator metrics independently | **Step 3: Cross-validation** If the new metric is a filtered subset of an existing metric, or a ratio of existing metrics, query them together to verify consistency: - For filtered metrics: query the filtered metric alongside the unfiltered total — the filtered value should be less than or equal to the total. - For ratio/derived metrics: query the numerator and denominator independently to confirm they return sensible values before checking the ratio. Call `get_data_from_fields` with both metrics: - `metrics`: `["<entity>.<filtered_metric>", "<entity>.<total_metric>"]` **Alert user if:** - Metric returns $0 or NULL unexpectedly - Revenue/count is negative - Ratio exceeds 100% or is negative (unless expected) - Magnitude seems off by orders of magnitude --- ### Attributes **Step 1: Execute the attribute** If the attribute references a related entity (multi-entity attribute), first verify the relation exists using `get_entity` on the source entity. If the relation is missing, report that before attempting to query the attribute. Sample rows — call `get_data_from_fields` with: - `attributes`: `["<entity>.<attribute_name>"]` For boolean attributes, check distribution — call `get_data_from_fields` with: - `attributes`: `["<entity>.<boolean_attribute>"]` - `metrics`: `["<entity>.count"]` **Step 2: Sanity checks by attribute type** | Attribute Type | Valid Range | Red Flags | | ------------------- | ------------------------ | ----------------------------------- | | **Age/Duration** | 0 to reasonable max | Negative values, >150 years | | **Boolean** | TRUE/FALSE mix | All TRUE or all FALSE | | **Percentage** | 0-100 (usually) | Negative, >100 (unless growth rate) | | **Date** | Past to near future | Year 1900, year 2099, all NULLs | | **Category/Bucket** | Expected labels | 95%+ in "Unknown" or NULL | | **Rank** | Starts at 1, consecutive | Starts at 0, gaps, all same value | | **Running total** | Monotonically increasing | Decreases, resets unexpectedly | | **Any type** | Mix of values | >50% NULLs warrants investigation | **Alert user if:** - All values are NULL or >50% NULLs - Boolean is 100% one value - Dates are invalid or in wrong century - Buckets are mostly "Unknown" --- ### Entities **Step 1: Verify entity was created** Use `list_entities` and filter results for the new entity name. **Step 2: Verify data flows** Call `get_data_from_fields` with: - `metrics`: `["<entity>.count"]` Also call with a list of attributes to verify they are accessible: - `attributes`: `["<entity>.<attribute1>", "<entity>.<attribute2>", "<entity>.<attribute3>"]` **Step 3: Sanity checks** | Check | What to Look For | Action if Failed | | --------------------- | -------------------------------- | ---------------------------- | | Entity exists | Shows in `list_entities` results | Check `create_entity` call | | Has rows | Count > 0 | Verify source table path | | Key is unique | Count = count distinct of key | Fix key or add composite key | | Attributes accessible | Can query attributes | Check dataset definition | **Alert user if:** - Entity not found after creation - Zero rows returned - Key column has duplicates (for non-fact tables) #### Validating Relations (part of entity validation) Relations are not standalone objects — they are defined within an entity's YAML. Validate them as part of the entity that contains them. **Step 1: Verify relation exists** Use `get_entity` on the source entity and check its relations list for the new relation. **Step 2: Test the join works** Call `get_data_from_fields` with a cross-entity query: - `attributes`: `["<target_entity>.<attribute>"]` - `metrics`: `["<source_entity>.<metric>"]` **Step 3: Sanity checks** | Check | What to Look For | Action if Failed | | ---------------- | ----------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- | | Relation exists | Shows in `get_entity` results | Check `update_object` call | | Join works | Cross-entity query succeeds | Verify join keys match | | No fan-out | Counts don't explode | Check cardinality (many-to-one vs many-to-many) | | NULLs reasonable | Some NULLs OK for left join | Too many NULLs = bad join key | **Alert user if:** - Relation not found on the entity - Cross-entity query fails - Row count explodes (indicates wrong cardinality) - All joined values are NULL (bad join condition) --- ### Domains **Step 1: Verify domain exists** Use `search_model` (with `search_mode: EXACT`) to find the new domain by name. **Step 2: Test with a scoped query** Call `get_data_from_fields` with the `domain` parameter to verify entities are accessible and filters apply: - `metrics`: `["<entity>.count"]` - `domain`: `"<domain_name>"` **Step 3: Verify filters apply** If the domain has semantic or source filters, compare results with and without the domain to confirm filters reduce the data as expected: - Query a metric **with** the domain set — note the result. - Query the same metric **without** the domain — note the result. - The domain-scoped result should be less than or equal to the unscoped result (for filters that restrict rows). **Step 4: Sanity checks** | Check | What to Look For | Action if Failed | | -------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- | | Domain exists | Found via `search_model` | Check `create_object` call and YAML syntax | | Entities accessible | Scoped query returns data | Verify entity names match existing entities | | Filters apply | Scoped count <= unscoped count | Check filter SQL and entity.field references | | Field selectors work | Excluded fields not returned in query | Verify selector patterns and order | | No errors | Query executes without compilation errors | Check filter SQL syntax, fully qualified refs | **Alert user if:** - Domain not found after creation - Scoped query returns an error (likely bad filter SQL or missing entity) - Filters have no effect (scoped count equals unscoped count when a filter is expected to reduce rows) - Excluded fields are still accessible (field selector not applied correctly) --- ## Validating Updates (update_object) When modifying an existing object, compare before and after: 1. **Before altering**, query the object and note the current result. 2. **After altering**, query again and compare. 3. Report the difference to the user: "The metric `revenue` changed from `$1,234,567` to `$1,198,432` after applying the discount logic." This confirms the change had the intended effect and helps catch unintended regressions. --- ## Error Handling If a tool call fails, distinguish between: | Situation | Meaning | Action | | ------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | Tool returns an error | API error, permission denied, timeout, invalid YAML | Report the error message to the user. Do not treat as a validation failure — the object may not have been created. | | Tool returns empty/NULL data | Object was created but returns no results | Proceed with sanity checks — likely a data or SQL issue. | | Tool returns unexpected values | Object works but results look wrong | Report findings and ask user before attempting a fix. | --- ## Alerting Guidelines When results seem wrong, report to the user with: 1. **The actual value** returned by the query 2. **Why it looks suspicious** (e.g., negative revenue, 100% NULL, row count doubled) 3. **A suggested next step** (e.g., "Should I check the SQL expression?" or "Should I verify the join keys?") Do not silently fix issues — always surface findings and ask before making changes. --- ## Quick Reference | Object | Execute With | Key Checks | | --------- | --------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | | Metric | `get_data_from_fields` with metrics list | Value, magnitude, sign, consistency | | Attribute | `get_data_from_fields` with attributes list | Range, distribution, NULLs | | Entity | `list_entities` + `get_data_from_fields` | Exists, has rows, key unique | | Relation | `get_entity` + cross-entity field query | Exists, joins work, no fan-out (validated as part of entity) | | Domain | `search_model` + `get_data_from_fields` with domain | Exists, filters apply, fields scoped |
Related Skills
More skills in Data, AI & Research
Ablation Planner
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (`claim_supported = yes` or `partial`) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission. A secondary Codex agent designs ablations from a reviewer's perspective; the local executor reviews feasibility and implements.
Ablation Planner
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (claim_supported=yes or partial) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission.
About
Provides information about the bitwize-music plugin, its version, and its creator. Use when the user asks about the plugin, its purpose, version, or capabilities.
Ab Test Analysis
Analyze A/B test results with statistical significance, sample size validation, confidence intervals, and ship/extend/stop recommendations. Use when evaluating experiment results, checking if a test reached significance, interpreting split test data, or deciding whether to ship a variant.
Academic Search
Search and analyze academic literature. Find papers, understand research methodologies, and synthesize academic findings for research projects.
Adaptyv
How to use the Adaptyv Bio Foundry API and Python SDK for protein experiment design, submission, and results retrieval. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Adaptyv, Foundry API, protein binding assays, protein screening experiments, BLI/SPR assays, thermostability assays, or wants to submit protein sequences for experimental characterization. Also trigger when code imports `adaptyv`, `adaptyv_sdk`, or `FoundryClient`, or references `foundry-api-public.adaptyvbio.com`.
Explore Other Categories
Skills from other categories with shared topics
Context Item Creation
Guides you through creating context items — instructions, skills, knowledge pointers, and memory events — that give the AI analyst persistent knowledge about your organization. Covers when to create each type, naming conventions, folder organization, and the hard boundary between context (rules and procedures) and the semantic layer (logic and calculations).
Workspace Branch
Use when setting up workspace and branch context, switching workspaces or branches, creating or deleting branches, reviewing branch history, or creating a pull request for a working branch. This skill should be used when the user asks to "list workspaces", "switch workspace", "create a branch", "delete a branch", "switch branch", "show branch history", "create a PR", or "open a pull request" in Honeydew.
Analytics
When the user wants to set up, improve, or audit analytics tracking and measurement. Also use when the user mentions "set up tracking," "GA4," "Google Analytics," "conversion tracking," "event tracking," "UTM parameters," "tag manager," "GTM," "analytics implementation," "tracking plan," "how do I measure this," "track conversions," "attribution," "Mixpanel," "Segment," "are my events firing," or "analytics isn't working." Use this whenever someone asks how to know if something is working or wants to measure marketing results. For A/B test measurement, see ab-testing.