Skip to content
All Skills

React18 Enzyme To Rtl

Provides exact Enzyme → React Testing Library migration patterns for React 18 upgrades. Use this skill whenever Enzyme tests need to be rewritten - shallow, mount, wrapper.find(), wrapper.simulate(), wrapper.prop(), wrapper.state(), wrapper.instance(), Enzyme configure/Adapter calls, or any test file that imports from enzyme. This skill covers the full API mapping and the philosophy shift from implementation testing to behavior testing. Always read this skill before rewriting Enzyme tests - do not translate Enzyme APIs 1:1, that produces brittle RTL tests.

Software Engineering|v1|Updated 7/14/2026|GitHub source
MCP get_skill({ skillId: "react-18-enzyme-rtl-migration-48668c5f" })

Use this skill with your agent

Create a free account and connect via MCP

Get Started Free
# React 18 Enzyme → RTL Migration

Enzyme has no React 18 adapter and no React 18 support path. All Enzyme tests must be rewritten using React Testing Library.

## The Philosophy Shift (Read This First)

Enzyme tests implementation. RTL tests behavior.

```jsx
// Enzyme: tests that the component has the right internal state
expect(wrapper.state('count')).toBe(3);
expect(wrapper.instance().handleClick).toBeDefined();
expect(wrapper.find('Button').prop('disabled')).toBe(true);

// RTL: tests what the user actually sees and can do
expect(screen.getByText('Count: 3')).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByRole('button', { name: /submit/i })).toBeDisabled();
```

This is not a 1:1 translation. Enzyme tests that verify internal state or instance methods don't have RTL equivalents - because RTL intentionally doesn't expose internals. **Rewrite the test to assert the visible outcome instead.**

## API Map

For complete before/after code for each Enzyme API, read:
- **`references/enzyme-api-map.md`** - full mapping: shallow, mount, find, simulate, prop, state, instance, configure
- **`references/async-patterns.md`** - waitFor, findBy, act(), Apollo MockedProvider, loading states, error states

## Core Rewrite Template

```jsx
// Every Enzyme test rewrites to this shape:
import { render, screen, fireEvent, waitFor } from '@testing-library/react';
import userEvent from '@testing-library/user-event';
import MyComponent from './MyComponent';

describe('MyComponent', () => {
  it('does the thing', async () => {
    // 1. Render (replaces shallow/mount)
    render(<MyComponent prop="value" />);

    // 2. Query (replaces wrapper.find())
    const button = screen.getByRole('button', { name: /submit/i });

    // 3. Interact (replaces simulate())
    await userEvent.setup().click(button);

    // 4. Assert on visible output (replaces wrapper.state() / wrapper.prop())
    expect(screen.getByText('Submitted!')).toBeInTheDocument();
  });
});
```

## RTL Query Priority (use in this order)

1. `getByRole` - matches accessible roles (button, textbox, heading, checkbox, etc.)
2. `getByLabelText` - form fields linked to labels
3. `getByPlaceholderText` - input placeholders
4. `getByText` - visible text content
5. `getByDisplayValue` - current value of input/select/textarea
6. `getByAltText` - image alt text
7. `getByTitle` - title attribute
8. `getByTestId` - `data-testid` attribute (last resort)

Prefer `getByRole` over `getByTestId`. It tests accessibility too.

## Wrapping with Providers

```jsx
// Enzyme with context:
const wrapper = mount(
  <ApolloProvider client={client}>
    <ThemeProvider theme={theme}>
      <MyComponent />
    </ThemeProvider>
  </ApolloProvider>
);

// RTL equivalent (use your project's customRender or wrap inline):
import { render } from '@testing-library/react';
render(
  <MockedProvider mocks={mocks} addTypename={false}>
    <ThemeProvider theme={theme}>
      <MyComponent />
    </ThemeProvider>
  </MockedProvider>
);
// Or use the project's customRender helper if it wraps providers
```
#github-copilot#testing

Related Skills

More skills in Software Engineering

Accessibility Standards

Comprehensive web accessibility standards based on WCAG 2.2 AA, with 38+ anti-patterns, legal enforcement context (EAA, ADA Title II), WAI-ARIA patterns, and framework-specific fixes for modern web frameworks and libraries.

#github-copilot#accessibilityMIT

Accord

Authoring unified specification packages across Business/Development/Design teams via staged elaboration (L0 Vision → L1 Requirements → L2 Team Detail → L3 Acceptance Criteria). No code. Use when authoring cross-team specs, building L0-L3 packages, or aligning Biz/Dev/Design on a single source of truth.

#broad-capability#developmentMIT

Acquire Codebase Knowledge

Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.

#github-copilot#documentationMIT

Acreadiness Assess

Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.

#github-copilot#planningMIT

Acreadiness Generate Instructions

Generate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.

#github-copilot#skillMIT

Acreadiness Policy

Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.

#github-copilot#planningMIT