Skip to content
All Skills

Quality

Comprehensive code quality assessment in spaces/[project]/. Use before commits, merges, or releases to ensure consistent quality.

Software Engineering|v1|Updated 7/14/2026|GitHub source
MCP get_skill({ skillId: "quality-81d09fba" })

Use this skill with your agent

Create a free account and connect via MCP

Get Started Free
# /quality

Comprehensive quality assessment of code using multi-agent analysis.

## Usage

```bash
/quality yourbench                  # Full assessment
/quality yourbench --focus security # Security-focused
/quality coordinatr --focus testing # Test coverage focus
```

## Focus Areas

| Flag | Analysis | Agent |
|------|----------|-------|
| (none) | All dimensions | All specialists |
| `--focus security` | OWASP, vulnerabilities | security-auditor |
| `--focus performance` | Bottlenecks, N+1 | performance-optimizer |
| `--focus testing` | Coverage, test quality | test-engineer |
| `--focus code` | Maintainability | code-reviewer |

## Execution Flow

### 1. Locate Project

```bash
ls spaces/[project]/
```

### 2. Run Automated Checks

```bash
cd spaces/[project]
npm test -- --coverage
npm run lint
npm run type-check  # if TypeScript
```

### 3. Agent Analysis

Coordinate specialists via Task tool:
- **code-reviewer**: Complexity, best practices
- **security-auditor**: OWASP Top 10
- **performance-optimizer**: N+1 queries, bottlenecks
- **test-engineer**: Coverage, test quality

### 4. Generate Report

```markdown
## Quality Assessment: [project]

**Overall Score: XX/100** [status]

### Code Quality: XX/100
- Issues found
- Recommendations

### Security: XX/100
- Critical/High/Medium issues
- Recommendations

### Performance: XX/100
- Bottlenecks identified
- Recommendations

### Testing: XX/100
- Coverage percentage
- Untested areas

### Priority Actions
1. **CRITICAL**: [action]
2. **HIGH**: [action]
3. **MEDIUM**: [action]
```

## Scoring

| Score | Status | Meaning |
|-------|--------|---------|
| 90-100 | Excellent | Ship it |
| 80-89 | Good | Minor improvements |
| 70-79 | Acceptable | Address soon |
| 60-69 | Concerning | Fix before merge |
| <60 | Critical | Must fix |

## Quality Dimensions

### Code Quality
- Cyclomatic complexity
- Code duplication
- SOLID principles
- Dead code detection

### Security
- OWASP Top 10
- Auth/authz patterns
- Input validation
- Secrets in code

### Performance
- N+1 query detection
- Inefficient algorithms
- Bundle size
- Caching opportunities

### Testing
- Line/branch coverage
- Test quality
- Edge case coverage
- Integration test gaps

## When to Use

- Before major release
- Onboarding to new codebase
- Periodic health checks
- Before refactoring
#personal-productivity#daily-routine#weekly-review#life-planning#personal-knowledge#code#qualitynodejsnpm

Related Skills

More skills in Software Engineering

Accessibility Standards

Comprehensive web accessibility standards based on WCAG 2.2 AA, with 38+ anti-patterns, legal enforcement context (EAA, ADA Title II), WAI-ARIA patterns, and framework-specific fixes for modern web frameworks and libraries.

#github-copilot#accessibilityMIT

Accord

Authoring unified specification packages across Business/Development/Design teams via staged elaboration (L0 Vision → L1 Requirements → L2 Team Detail → L3 Acceptance Criteria). No code. Use when authoring cross-team specs, building L0-L3 packages, or aligning Biz/Dev/Design on a single source of truth.

#broad-capability#developmentMIT

Acquire Codebase Knowledge

Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.

#github-copilot#documentationMIT

Acreadiness Assess

Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.

#github-copilot#planningMIT

Acreadiness Generate Instructions

Generate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.

#github-copilot#skillMIT

Acreadiness Policy

Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.

#github-copilot#planningMIT