Lean4
Use when editing .lean files, debugging Lean 4 builds (type mismatch, sorry, failed to synthesize instance, axiom warnings, lake build errors), searching mathlib for lemmas, formalizing mathematics in Lean, or learning Lean 4 concepts. Also trigger when the user asks for help with Lean 4, mathlib, or lakefile. Do NOT trigger for Coq/Rocq, Agda, Isabelle, HOL4, Mizar, Idris, Megalodon, or other non-Lean theorem provers.
MCP get_skill({ skillId: "lean4-aba88d1c" })Use this skill with your agent
Create a free account and connect via MCP
# Lean 4 Theorem Proving
Use this skill whenever you're editing Lean 4 proofs, debugging Lean builds, formalizing mathematics in Lean, or learning Lean 4 concepts. It prioritizes LSP-based inspection and mathlib search, with scripted primitives for sorry analysis, axiom checking, and error parsing.
## Core Principles
**Search before prove.** Many mathematical facts already exist in mathlib. Search exhaustively before writing tactics.
**Build incrementally.** Lean's type checker is your test suite—if it compiles with no sorries and standard axioms only, the proof is sound.
**Respect scope.** Follow the user's preference: fill one sorry, its transitive dependencies, all sorries in a file, or everything. Ask if unclear.
**Use 100-character line width for Lean files.** Do not wrap lines at 80 characters — Lean and mathlib convention is 100. If a line fits within 100 characters, keep it on one line. See [mathlib-style](references/mathlib-style.md) for breaking strategies when lines exceed 100.
**Never change statements or add axioms without explicit permission.** Theorem/lemma statements, type signatures, and docstrings are off-limits unless the user requests changes. Inline comments may be adjusted; docstrings may not (they're part of the API). Custom axioms require explicit approval—if a proof seems to need one, stop and discuss. Exception: within synthesis wrappers (`/lean4:formalize`, `/lean4:autoformalize`), session-generated declarations may be redrafted under the outer-loop statement-safety rules; see cycle-engine.md.
## Commands
| Command | Purpose |
|---------|---------|
| `/lean4:draft` | Draft Lean declaration skeletons from informal claims |
| `/lean4:formalize` | Interactive formalization — drafting plus guided proving |
| `/lean4:autoformalize` | Autonomous end-to-end formalization from informal sources |
| `/lean4:prove` | Guided cycle-by-cycle theorem proving with explicit checkpoints |
| `/lean4:autoprove` | Autonomous multi-cycle theorem proving with explicit stop budgets |
| `/lean4:checkpoint` | Save progress with a safe commit checkpoint |
| `/lean4:review` | Read-only code review of Lean proofs |
| `/lean4:refactor` | Leverage mathlib, extract helpers, simplify proof strategies |
| `/lean4:golf` | Improve Lean proofs for directness, clarity, performance, and brevity |
| `/lean4:learn` | Interactive teaching and mathlib exploration |
| `/lean4:doctor` | Diagnostics, cleanup, and migration help |
This plugin ships a host-agnostic parser (`lib/command_args/`) that covers the
parser-decidable startup rules of the six parameter-heavy commands (`draft`,
`learn`, `formalize`, `autoformalize`, `prove`, `autoprove`). A small set of
documented startup rules in these commands depend on runtime context (repo-
level search, interactive prompting) and are applied by the command after
reading the parser's output. The other commands (`checkpoint`, `review`,
`refactor`, `golf`, `doctor`) remain model-parsed.
When a host adapter installs the `UserPromptSubmit` hook, the parser runs
before the model sees a `/lean4:*` prompt matching one of the six covered
commands, injects a `validated-invocation` block into context, and rejects
invalid invocations at the hook level; invocations of the other commands pass
through unchanged. Hosts without the hook fall back to model-parsed startup
via the shared [command-invocation.md](references/command-invocation.md)
contract.
Commands always announce resolved inputs, reject invalid startup configs before
doing work, and treat wall-clock budgets like `--max-total-runtime` as
best-effort.
### Which Command?
| Situation | Command |
|-----------|---------|
| Draft a Lean skeleton (skeleton by default) | `/lean4:draft` |
| Draft + prove interactively | `/lean4:formalize` |
| Filling sorries (interactive) | `/lean4:prove` |
| Filling sorries (unattended) | `/lean4:autoprove` |
| Save point (per-file + project build, best-effort axiom scan, commit) | `/lean4:checkpoint` |
| Quality check (read-only) | `/lean4:review` |
| Simplify proof strategies (mathlib leverage, helpers) | `/lean4:refactor` |
| Optimizing compiled proofs | `/lean4:golf` |
| New to this project / exploring | `/lean4:learn --mode=repo` |
| Navigating mathlib for a topic | `/lean4:learn --mode=mathlib` |
| Something not working | `/lean4:doctor` |
| Formalize + prove end-to-end (unattended) | `/lean4:autoformalize --source=... --claim-select=first --out=...` |
## Contributing (lean4-contribute plugin)
**If the `lean4-contribute` plugin is installed,** you may **suggest** these commands at natural stopping points. Rules:
- **Suggest first, never invoke unprompted.** Offer a one-line question; do not start the command flow.
- **Only invoke after explicit user opt-in** in the current conversation. Silence, topic change, or implicit frustration do not count as consent.
- **At most once per topic per session** unless the user engages.
- **Never mid-proof.** Wait for a natural stopping point.
| Situation | Suggest |
|-----------|---------|
| Problem appears to be in lean4-skills itself (wrong command behavior, contradictory docs, broken lint, bad guardrail, confusing plugin UX) — not ordinary Lean/mathlib/user-proof problems | "This looks like a lean4-skills bug. Want me to draft a bug report?" → `/lean4-contribute:bug-report` |
| User wants a workflow the plugin doesn't support, says a command should behave differently, or you must recommend awkward manual steps due to a missing feature | "This looks like a plugin workflow gap. Want me to draft a feature request?" → `/lean4-contribute:feature-request` |
| Result seems reusable beyond the current task: tactic-selection heuristic, mathlib search pattern, anti-pattern, documentation gap with a clear lesson — not one-off theorem facts or private repo details | "That seems reusable beyond this task. Want me to draft a shareable insight?" → `/lean4-contribute:share-insight` |
**If the plugin is not installed** and the user clearly hit a lean4-skills bug, workflow gap, or reusable insight (same criteria as above — not ordinary Lean/mathlib issues), you may offer the install hint once:
- At most once per session. Do not repeat if the user declined, ignored it, or moved on.
- Never mid-proof or during an active debugging loop.
- One short line, not a pitch: "If you want, install the `lean4-contribute` plugin and I can draft that report for you here." See the [lean4-contribute README](../../../../plugins/lean4-contribute/README.md#installation) for setup.
## Typical Workflow
```
┌─ Entry points (pick one) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ /lean4:draft Skeleton by default (--mode=attempt for shallow proof) │
│ /lean4:formalize Interactive: draft + guided proving │
│ /lean4:autoformalize Autonomous: draft + autonomous proving │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓ (if sorries remain)
/lean4:prove / autoprove Proof engines (sorry filling, no header edits)
↓
/lean4:refactor Leverage mathlib, extract helpers (optional)
↓
/lean4:golf Improve proofs (optional)
↓
/lean4:checkpoint Save point (per-file + project build)
```
Use `/lean4:learn` at any point to explore repo structure or navigate mathlib. Three entry points: `/lean4:draft` for skeletons, `/lean4:formalize` for interactive synthesis (draft + guided proving), `/lean4:autoformalize` for unattended source-to-proof.
**Notes:**
- `/lean4:prove` asks before each cycle; `/lean4:autoprove` loops autonomously with explicit stop budgets
- Both trigger `/lean4:review` at configured intervals (`--review-every`)
- When reviews run (via `--review-every`), they act as gates: review → replan → continue. In prove, replan requires user approval; in autoprove, replan auto-continues
- Review supports `--mode=batch` (default) or `--mode=stuck` (triage); review is always read-only
- `/lean4:autoformalize` wraps draft+autoprove in a single command (source → claims → skeletons → proofs); replaces `autoprove --formalize=auto`
- Proof engines (`prove`/`autoprove`) never modify declaration headers (header fence)
- If you hit environment issues, run `/lean4:doctor` to diagnose
## LSP Tools (Preferred)
Sub-second feedback and search tools (LeanSearch, Loogle, LeanFinder) via Lean LSP MCP:
```
lean_goal(file, line) # See exact goal
lean_hover_info(file, line, col) # Understand types
lean_local_search("keyword") # Fast local + mathlib (unlimited)
lean_leanfinder("goal or query") # Semantic, goal-aware (10/30s)
lean_leansearch("natural language") # Semantic search (3/30s)
lean_loogle("?a → ?b → _") # Type-pattern (unlimited if local mode)
lean_hammer_premise(file, line, col) # Premise suggestions for simp/aesop/grind (3/30s)
lean_state_search(file, line, col) # Goal-conditioned lemma search (3/30s)
lean_multi_attempt(file, line, snippets=[...]) # Test multiple tactics
lean_diagnostic_messages(file) # Per-file error/warning check
lean_code_actions(file, line) # Resolve "Try this" suggestions to edits
```
`lean_run_code` is for isolated scratch experiments, not a substitute for live proof-state inspection via `lean_goal`/`lean_multi_attempt`/`lean_diagnostic_messages`. Prefer live-file tools when the question depends on actual file context.
## Capabilities
| Capability | Required | Check | Fallback |
|-----------|----------|-------|----------|
| Lean / Lake | yes | `lean --version`, `lake --version` | none — run `/lean4:doctor` |
| Python 3 | yes (scripts) | `$LEAN4_PYTHON_BIN` set by bootstrap | none for script-dependent operations |
| `$LEAN4_SCRIPTS` | yes (set by bootstrap) | `echo "$LEAN4_SCRIPTS"` | run `/lean4:doctor` |
| Lean LSP MCP | no | try `lean_goal` on any `.lean` file | scripts + `lake env lean` (file-level only) |
| `lean_run_code` | no | try calling it | `lake env lean` on temp file |
| `lean_code_actions` | no | try calling it | manual "Try this" application |
| Subagent dispatch | no | host-dependent | run work in main thread |
| Slash commands | no | host-dependent | follow skill instructions directly |
## Operating Profiles
The skill adapts to what's available. Determine your profile by checking capabilities above, then follow the corresponding guidance.
### full (all capabilities)
MCP + subagents + commands. Full workflow with live goal inspection, tactic testing, and parallel subagent dispatch (requires disjoint owned-file sets per agent, or separate worktrees). Subagents get pre-collected MCP context per [cycle-engine.md § Pre-flight Context](references/cycle-engine.md#pre-flight-context-for-subagent-dispatch). If `lean_run_code` is unavailable, use `/tmp` scratch files with `lake env lean` for isolated experiments.
### mcp_main_only (MCP available, no subagent dispatch)
MCP works in the main thread. Run all proof work directly — do not delegate to subagents. All cycle-engine phases execute in-thread. If `lean_run_code` is unavailable, use `/tmp` scratch files with `lake env lean` for isolated experiments.
### scripts_only (no MCP, no subagents)
Use `$LEAN4_SCRIPTS` for search and `lake env lean` / `lake build` for validation. **Key limitations in this mode:**
- **No live goal inspection** — `lean_goal` is unavailable; you can read the file and check compilation output, but cannot see proof state at a specific line
- **No tactic testing** — `lean_multi_attempt` is unavailable; edits must be validated by compiling the file (`lake env lean`)
- **No real-time diagnostics** — `lean_diagnostic_messages` is unavailable; use `lake env lean <file>` (from project root) for compilation errors, but feedback is file-level, not line-level
- **Search is script-based** — `$LEAN4_SCRIPTS/smart_search.sh` replaces LSP search tools
This mode is functional for straightforward proofs but significantly slower and less precise than MCP-backed workflows.
### review_only (read-only, no edits)
Read proof state and assess quality. No edits, no commits, no subagent dispatch.
## File Handling Rules
**Scratch-work ladder** (in preference order):
1. Live file + MCP tools (`lean_goal`, `lean_multi_attempt`, `lean_diagnostic_messages`)
2. `lean_run_code` for isolated experiments
3. `/tmp` scratch files only when `lean_run_code` is unavailable and the experiment must not touch the live file
4. Never create scratch files in the repo root
**File inspection:** Use Read and Grep to view source files. Never write Python scripts, temp files, or use `cat` pipelines just to read lines from a file you already have access to.
**Staging:** Stage only files touched during the current session. Never use `git add -A` or broad glob patterns. Print the exact staged set before committing.
See [sorry-filling.md](references/sorry-filling.md) for the full scratch-work preference order.
## Core Primitives
| Script | Purpose | Output |
|--------|---------|--------|
| `sorry_analyzer.py` | Find sorries with context | text (default), json, markdown, summary |
| `check_axioms_inline.sh` | Best-effort axiom scan (top-level declarations) | text |
| `smart_search.sh` | Multi-source mathlib search | text |
| `find_golfable.py` | Detect optimization patterns | JSON |
| `find_usages.sh` | Find declaration usages | text |
**Usage:** Invoked by commands automatically. See [references/](references/) for details.
**Invocation contract:** Never run bare script names. Always use:
- Python: `${LEAN4_PYTHON_BIN:-python3} "$LEAN4_SCRIPTS/script.py" ...`
- Shell: `bash "$LEAN4_SCRIPTS/script.sh" ...`
- Report-only calls: add `--report-only` to `sorry_analyzer.py`, `check_axioms_inline.sh`, `unused_declarations.sh` — suppresses exit 1 on findings; real errors still exit 1. Do not use in gate commands like `/lean4:checkpoint`.
- Keep stderr visible for Lean scripts (no `/dev/null` redirection), so real errors are not hidden.
If `$LEAN4_SCRIPTS` is unset or missing, run `/lean4:doctor` and stay LSP-only until resolved.
## Automation
`/lean4:prove` and `/lean4:autoprove` handle most tasks:
- **prove** — guided, asks before each cycle. Ideal for interactive sessions.
- **autoprove** — autonomous, loops with explicit stop budgets. Ideal for unattended runs.
Both share the same cycle engine (plan → work → checkpoint → review → replan → continue/stop) and follow the [LSP-first protocol](references/cycle-engine.md#lsp-first-protocol): LSP tools are normative for discovery and search; script fallback only when LSP is unavailable or exhausted. Compiler-guided repair is escalation-only — not the first response to build errors. For complex proofs, they may delegate to internal workflows for deep sorry-filling (with snapshot, rollback, and scope budgets), proof repair, or axiom elimination. You don't invoke these directly.
## Skill-Only Behavior
When editing `.lean` files without invoking a command, the skill runs **one bounded pass**:
- Read the goal or error via `lean_goal`/`lean_diagnostic_messages`
- Search mathlib with up to 2 LSP tools (e.g. `lean_local_search` + `lean_leanfinder`/`lean_leansearch`/`lean_loogle`)
- Try the [Automation Tactics](#automation-tactics) cascade
- Validate with `lean_diagnostic_messages` (no project-gate `lake build` in this mode)
- No looping, no deep escalation, no multi-cycle behavior, no commits
- End with suggestions:
> Use `/lean4:prove` for guided cycle-by-cycle help.
> Use `/lean4:autoprove` for autonomous cycles with stop safeguards.
## Quality Gate
A proof is complete when:
- `lake build` passes
- Zero sorries in agreed scope
- Only standard axioms (`propext`, `Classical.choice`, `Quot.sound`)
- No statement changes without permission
Verification ladder: `lean_diagnostic_messages(file)` per-edit → `lake env lean <path/to/File.lean>` file gate (run from project root) → `lake build` project gate only. See [cycle-engine: Build Target Policy](references/cycle-engine.md#build-target-policy).
## Common Fixes
See [compilation-errors](references/compilation-errors.md) for error-by-error guidance (type mismatch, unknown identifier, failed to synthesize, timeout, etc.).
## Type Class Patterns
```lean
-- Local instance for this proof block
haveI : MeasurableSpace Ω := inferInstance
letI : Fintype α := ⟨...⟩
-- Scoped instances (affects current section)
open scoped Topology MeasureTheory
```
Order matters: provide outer structures before inner ones.
## Automation Tactics
Try in order (stop on first success):
`rfl` → `simp` → `ring` → `linarith` → `nlinarith` → `omega` → `exact?` → `apply?` → `grind` → `aesop`
Note: `exact?`/`apply?` query mathlib (slow). `grind` and `aesop` are powerful but may timeout. See [grind-tactic](references/grind-tactic.md) for interactive workflows, annotation strategy, and simproc escalation.
## Troubleshooting
If LSP tools aren't responding, check your operating profile above. In `scripts_only` mode, `$LEAN4_SCRIPTS` provides search and `lake env lean` provides file-level compilation feedback, but live goal inspection, tactic testing, and line-level diagnostics are unavailable. If environment variables (`LEAN4_SCRIPTS`, `LEAN4_REFS`) are missing, run `/lean4:doctor` to diagnose.
**Script environment check:**
```bash
echo "$LEAN4_SCRIPTS"
ls -l "$LEAN4_SCRIPTS/sorry_analyzer.py"
# One-pass discovery for troubleshooting (human-readable default text):
${LEAN4_PYTHON_BIN:-python3} "$LEAN4_SCRIPTS/sorry_analyzer.py" . --report-only
# Structured output (optional): --format=json
# Counts only (optional): --format=summary
```
**Cold start / fresh worktree:**
- Fresh worktree or after `lake clean`? Prime the cache in that worktree before the first real build.
- Use the project's cache command: `lake cache get` on newer Lake, or `lake exe cache get` where the project still uses the mathlib cache executable.
- If Lean LSP is cold or timing out on first use, run one `lake build` to bootstrap the workspace.
- After bootstrap, return to the normal verification ladder:
`lean_diagnostic_messages(file)` → `lake env lean <path/to/File.lean>` (from project root) → `lake build` only at checkpoint/final gate.
- Do **not** symlink another worktree's `.lake/build`; use Lake cache/artifact mechanisms instead.
## References
**Cycle Engine:** [cycle-engine](references/cycle-engine.md) — shared prove/autoprove logic (stuck, deep mode, falsification, safety)
**LSP Tools:** [lean-lsp-server](references/lean-lsp-server.md) (quick start), [lean-lsp-tools-api](references/lean-lsp-tools-api.md) (full API — grep `^##` for tool names)
**Search:** [mathlib-guide](references/mathlib-guide.md) (read when searching for existing lemmas), [lean-phrasebook](references/lean-phrasebook.md) (math→Lean translations)
**Errors:** [compilation-errors](references/compilation-errors.md) (read first for any build error), [instance-pollution](references/instance-pollution.md) (typeclass conflicts — grep `## Sub-` for patterns), [compiler-guided-repair](references/compiler-guided-repair.md) (escalation-only repair — not first-pass)
**Tactics:** [tactics-reference](references/tactics-reference.md) (tactic lookup — grep `^### TacticName`), [grind-tactic](references/grind-tactic.md) (SMT-style automation — when simp can't close), [simp-reference](references/simp-reference.md) (simp hygiene + custom simprocs), [tactic-patterns](references/tactic-patterns.md), [calc-patterns](references/calc-patterns.md)
**Proof Development:** [proof-templates](references/proof-templates.md), [proof-refactoring](references/proof-refactoring.md) (28K — grep by topic), [proof-simplification](references/proof-simplification.md) (strategy-level: mathlib search, congr lemmas, helper extraction), [sorry-filling](references/sorry-filling.md)
**Optimization:** [proof-golfing](references/proof-golfing.md) (includes safety rules, bounded LSP lemma replacement, bulk rewrites, anti-patterns; escalates to axiom-eliminator), [proof-golfing-patterns](references/proof-golfing-patterns.md), [performance-optimization](references/performance-optimization.md) (grep by symptom), [profiling-workflows](references/profiling-workflows.md) (diagnose slow builds/proofs)
**Domain:** [domain-patterns](references/domain-patterns.md) (25K — grep `## Area`), [measure-theory](references/measure-theory.md) (28K), [axiom-elimination](references/axiom-elimination.md)
**Style:** [mathlib-style](references/mathlib-style.md), [verso-docs](references/verso-docs.md) (Verso doc comment roles and fixups)
**Custom Syntax:** [lean4-custom-syntax](references/lean4-custom-syntax.md) (read when building notations, macros, elaborators, or DSLs), [metaprogramming-patterns](references/metaprogramming-patterns.md) (MetaM/TacticM API — composable blocks, elaborators), [scaffold-dsl](references/scaffold-dsl.md) (copy-paste DSL template), [json-patterns](references/json-patterns.md) (json% syntax + ToJson)
**Quality:** [linter-authoring](references/linter-authoring.md) (project-specific linter rules), [ffi-interop](references/ffi-interop.md) (FFI, `@&`, init, symbol linkage)
**Workflows:** [agent-workflows](references/agent-workflows.md), [subagent-workflows](references/subagent-workflows.md), [command-examples](references/command-examples.md), [learn-pathways](references/learn-pathways.md) (intent taxonomy, game tracks, source handling)
**Internals:** [review-hook-schema](references/review-hook-schema.md), [compiler-internals](references/compiler-internals.md) (attributes, specialization, pipeline)Related Skills
More skills in Science & Simulation
Adaptyv
Cloud laboratory platform for automated protein testing and validation. Use when designing proteins and needing experimental validation including binding assays, expression testing, thermostability measurements, enzyme activity assays, or protein sequence optimization. Also use for submitting experiments via API, tracking experiment status, downloading results, optimizing protein sequences for better expression using computational tools (NetSolP, SoluProt, SolubleMPNN, ESM), or managing protein design workflows with wet-lab validation.
AI Analyzer
AI驱动的综合健康分析系统,整合多维度健康数据、识别异常模式、预测健康风险、提供个性化建议。支持智能问答和AI健康报告生成。
Ansys Simulation
Automate ANSYS Fluent CFD simulations via Python scripting and journal files
Astropy
Comprehensive Python library for astronomy and astrophysics. This skill should be used when working with astronomical data including celestial coordinates, physical units, FITS files, cosmological calculations, time systems, tables, world coordinate systems (WCS), and astronomical data analysis. Use when tasks involve coordinate transformations, unit conversions, FITS file manipulation, cosmological distance calculations, time scale conversions, or astronomical data processing.
Bioservices
Unified Python interface to 40+ bioinformatics services. Use when querying multiple databases (UniProt, KEGG, ChEMBL, Reactome) in a single workflow with consistent API. Best for cross-database analysis, ID mapping across services. For quick single-database lookups use gget; for sequence/file manipulation use biopython.
Bom
BOM (Bill of Materials) management for electronics projects — the primary orchestrator skill that coordinates DigiKey, Mouser, LCSC, element14, JLCPCB, PCBWay, and KiCad skills into a unified workflow. Create, update, and maintain BOMs with part numbers, costs, quantities stored as KiCad symbol properties. ALWAYS trigger this skill for any task involving component sourcing, pricing, ordering, distributor searches, BOM export, or fabrication preparation — even if the user names a specific distributor or fab house (e.g. "search DigiKey for...", "generate JLCPCB BOM", "order from Mouser"). This skill decides which distributor/fab skills to invoke and in what order. Also trigger on phrases like "what parts do I need", "order components", "how much will this cost", "export for JLCPCB", "find parts for this board", "cost estimate", "compare pricing", or "check stock".
Explore Other Categories
Skills from other categories with shared topics
Lean Bisect
Bisect Lean toolchain versions to find where behavior changes. Use when trying to identify which Lean 4 commit caused a regression or behavior change.
Lean Mwe
Create minimal working examples (MWEs) from Lean errors for bug reports. Use when minimizing a Lean error, creating an MWE, or preparing a bug report for lean4 or mathlib4.
Lean PR
PR conventions for the leanprover/lean4 repository. Use when creating pull requests, writing commit messages, or following project conventions for Lean contributions.