Skip to content
All Skills

Hunting For Persistence Mechanisms In Windows

Systematically hunt for adversary persistence mechanisms across Windows endpoints including registry, services, startup folders, and WMI subscriptions.

Security & Compliance|v1|Updated 7/14/2026|GitHub source
MCP get_skill({ skillId: "hunting-for-persistence-mechanisms-in-windows-24b37d87" })

Use this skill with your agent

Create a free account and connect via MCP

Get Started Free
# Hunting for Persistence Mechanisms in Windows

## When to Use

- During periodic proactive threat hunts for dormant backdoors
- After an incident to identify all persistence mechanisms an attacker planted
- When investigating unusual services, scheduled tasks, or startup entries
- When threat intel reports describe new persistence techniques in the wild
- During security posture assessments to identify unauthorized persistent software

## Prerequisites

- Sysmon deployed with Event IDs 12/13/14 (Registry), 19/20/21 (WMI), 1 (Process Creation)
- Windows Security Event forwarding for 4697 (Service Install), 4698 (Scheduled Task)
- EDR with registry and file monitoring capabilities
- PowerShell script block logging enabled (Event ID 4104)
- Autoruns or equivalent baseline of legitimate persistent entries

## Workflow

1. **Enumerate Known Persistence Locations**: Build a comprehensive list of Windows persistence points (Run keys, services, scheduled tasks, WMI, startup folder, DLL search order, COM hijacks, AppInit DLLs, Image File Execution Options).
2. **Collect Endpoint Data**: Use EDR, Sysmon, or Velociraptor to collect current persistence artifacts from endpoints across the environment.
3. **Baseline Legitimate Persistence**: Compare collected data against known-good baselines (Autoruns snapshots, GPO-deployed entries, SCCM configurations).
4. **Identify Anomalies**: Flag new, unsigned, or unknown entries in persistence locations that deviate from the baseline.
5. **Investigate Suspicious Entries**: For each anomaly, examine the binary it points to, its digital signature, file hash, and creation timestamp.
6. **Correlate with Process Activity**: Link persistence entries to process execution, network activity, and user login events.
7. **Document and Remediate**: Record findings, remove malicious persistence, and update detection rules.

## Key Concepts

| Concept | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| T1547.001 | Registry Run Keys / Startup Folder |
| T1543.003 | Windows Service (Create or Modify) |
| T1053.005 | Scheduled Task |
| T1546.003 | WMI Event Subscription |
| T1546.015 | Component Object Model (COM) Hijacking |
| T1546.012 | Image File Execution Options Injection |
| T1546.010 | AppInit DLLs |
| T1547.004 | Winlogon Helper DLL |
| T1547.005 | Security Support Provider |
| T1574.001 | DLL Search Order Hijacking |
| TA0003 | Persistence Tactic |
| Autoruns | Sysinternals tool showing persistent entries |

## Tools & Systems

| Tool | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| Sysinternals Autoruns | Comprehensive persistence enumeration |
| Velociraptor | Endpoint-wide persistence artifact collection |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | Real-time persistence monitoring |
| Sysmon | Registry and WMI event monitoring |
| OSQuery | SQL-based persistence queries |
| RECmd | Registry Explorer for forensic analysis |
| Splunk | SIEM correlation of persistence events |

## Common Scenarios

1. **Registry Run Key Backdoor**: Malware adds `HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run` entry pointing to payload in `%APPDATA%`.
2. **WMI Event Subscription**: Adversary creates WMI consumer/filter pair that executes PowerShell on system boot.
3. **Malicious Service**: Attacker creates Windows service with `sc create` pointing to a backdoor binary.
4. **COM Object Hijack**: Legitimate COM CLSID InprocServer32 path replaced with malicious DLL.
5. **IFEO Debugger Injection**: Image File Execution Options key set with debugger pointing to implant for common utilities.

## Output Format

```
Hunt ID: TH-PERSIST-[DATE]-[SEQ]
Persistence Type: [Registry/Service/Task/WMI/COM/Other]
MITRE Technique: T1547.xxx / T1543.xxx / T1053.xxx
Location: [Full registry key / service name / task path]
Value: [Binary path / command line]
Host(s): [Affected endpoints]
Signed: [Yes/No]
Hash: [SHA256]
Creation Time: [Timestamp]
Risk Level: [Critical/High/Medium/Low]
Verdict: [Malicious/Suspicious/Benign]
```
#mukul-cybersecurity-skills#security#cybersecurity#threat#intelligence

Related Skills

More skills in Security & Compliance

1password

Set up and use 1Password CLI (op). Use when installing the CLI, enabling desktop app integration, signing in, and reading/injecting secrets for commands.

#broad-capability#developmentMIT

1password

Set up and use 1Password CLI for sign-in, desktop integration, and reading or injecting secrets.

#identity#accessMIT

Accessibility Lead

Accessibility team lead and orchestrator. Use proactively on EVERY task that involves web UI code, HTML, JSX, CSS, React components, web pages, server-side templates (.leaf, .ejs, .erb, .hbs), or any user-facing web content. This agent coordinates the accessibility specialist team and ensures no accessibility requirement is missed. Runs the final review before any UI code is considered complete. Applies to any web framework, server-side templating framework (Vapor/Leaf, Rails/ERB, Django/Jinja, Express/EJS), or vanilla HTML/CSS/JS. Works alongside other team leads (e.g., swift-lead) in multi-language projects.

#broad-capability#accessibilityMIT

Accessibility Regression Detector

Detects accessibility regressions by comparing audit results across commits/branches. Tracks score trends, identifies new issues, and validates previous fixes remain in place.

#broad-capability#accessibilityMIT

Accessibility Statement

Generates conformance/accessibility statements following W3C or EU model templates. Takes audit results as input, maps to conformance claims, identifies known limitations, and outputs a deployable HTML page or markdown document.

#broad-capability#accessibilityMIT

Accessibility Tool Builder

Expert in building accessibility scanning tools, rule engines, document parsers, report generators, and audit automation. WCAG criterion mapping, severity scoring, CLI/GUI scanner architecture, CI/CD integration.

#broad-capability#accessibilityMIT