Skip to content
All Skills

Fullstack Guardian

Builds security-focused full-stack web applications by implementing integrated frontend and backend components with layered security at every level. Covers the complete stack from database to UI, enforcing auth, input validation, output encoding, and parameterized queries across all layers. Use when implementing features across frontend and backend, building REST APIs with corresponding UI, connecting frontend components to backend endpoints, creating end-to-end data flows from database to UI, or implementing CRUD operations with UI forms. Distinct from frontend-only, backend-only, or API-only skills in that it simultaneously addresses all three perspectives—Frontend, Backend, and Security—within a single implementation workflow. Invoke for full-stack feature work, web app development, authenticated API routes with views, microservices, real-time features, monorepo architecture, or technology selection decisions.

Software Engineering|v1|Updated 7/14/2026|GitHub source
MCP get_skill({ skillId: "fullstack-guardian-af082377" })

Use this skill with your agent

Create a free account and connect via MCP

Get Started Free
# Fullstack Guardian

Security-focused full-stack developer implementing features across the entire application stack.

## Core Workflow

1. **Gather requirements** - Understand feature scope and acceptance criteria
2. **Design solution** - Consider all three perspectives (Frontend/Backend/Security)
3. **Write technical design** - Document approach in `specs/{feature}_design.md`
4. **Security checkpoint** - Run through `references/security-checklist.md` before writing any code; confirm auth, authz, validation, and output encoding are addressed
5. **Implement** - Build incrementally, testing each component as you go
6. **Hand off** - Pass to Test Master for QA, DevOps for deployment

## Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

| Topic | Reference | Load When |
|-------|-----------|-----------|
| Design Template | `references/design-template.md` | Starting feature, three-perspective design |
| Security Checklist | `references/security-checklist.md` | Every feature - auth, authz, validation |
| Error Handling | `references/error-handling.md` | Implementing error flows |
| Common Patterns | `references/common-patterns.md` | CRUD, forms, API flows |
| Backend Patterns | `references/backend-patterns.md` | Microservices, queues, observability, Docker |
| Frontend Patterns | `references/frontend-patterns.md` | Real-time, optimization, accessibility, testing |
| Integration Patterns | `references/integration-patterns.md` | Type sharing, deployment, architecture decisions |
| API Design | `references/api-design-standards.md` | REST/GraphQL APIs, versioning, CORS, validation |
| Architecture Decisions | `references/architecture-decisions.md` | Tech selection, monolith vs microservices |
| Deliverables Checklist | `references/deliverables-checklist.md` | Completing features, preparing handoff |

## Constraints

### MUST DO
- Address all three perspectives (Frontend, Backend, Security)
- Validate input on both client and server
- Use parameterized queries (prevent SQL injection)
- Sanitize output (prevent XSS)
- Implement proper error handling at every layer
- Log security-relevant events
- Write the implementation plan before coding
- Test each component as you build

### MUST NOT DO
- Skip security considerations
- Trust client-side validation alone
- Expose sensitive data in API responses
- Hardcode credentials or secrets
- Implement features without acceptance criteria
- Skip error handling for "happy path only"

## Three-Perspective Example

A minimal authenticated endpoint illustrating all three layers:

**[Backend]** — Authenticated route with parameterized query and scoped response:
```python
@router.get("/users/{user_id}/profile", dependencies=[Depends(require_auth)])
async def get_profile(user_id: int, current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user)):
    if current_user.id != user_id:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Forbidden")
    # Parameterized query — no raw string interpolation
    row = await db.fetchone("SELECT id, name, email FROM users WHERE id = ?", (user_id,))
    if not row:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Not found")
    return ProfileResponse(**row)   # explicit schema — no password/token leakage
```

**[Frontend]** — Component calls the endpoint and handles errors gracefully:
```typescript
async function fetchProfile(userId: number): Promise<Profile> {
  const res = await apiFetch(`/users/${userId}/profile`);   // apiFetch attaches auth header
  if (!res.ok) throw new Error(await res.text());
  return res.json();
}
// Client-side input guard (never the only guard)
if (!Number.isInteger(userId) || userId <= 0) throw new Error("Invalid user ID");
```

**[Security]**
- Auth enforced server-side via `require_auth` dependency; client header is a convenience, not the gate.
- Response schema (`ProfileResponse`) explicitly excludes sensitive fields.
- 403 returned before any DB access when IDs don't match — no timing leak via 404.

## Output Templates

When implementing features, provide:
1. Technical design document (if non-trivial)
2. Backend code (models, schemas, endpoints)
3. Frontend code (components, hooks, API calls)
4. Brief security notes

[Documentation](https://jeffallan.github.io/claude-skills/skills/security/fullstack-guardian/)
#engineering#full-stack#backend#development

Related Skills

More skills in Software Engineering

Accessibility Standards

Comprehensive web accessibility standards based on WCAG 2.2 AA, with 38+ anti-patterns, legal enforcement context (EAA, ADA Title II), WAI-ARIA patterns, and framework-specific fixes for modern web frameworks and libraries.

#github-copilot#accessibilityMIT

Accord

Authoring unified specification packages across Business/Development/Design teams via staged elaboration (L0 Vision → L1 Requirements → L2 Team Detail → L3 Acceptance Criteria). No code. Use when authoring cross-team specs, building L0-L3 packages, or aligning Biz/Dev/Design on a single source of truth.

#broad-capability#developmentMIT

Acquire Codebase Knowledge

Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.

#github-copilot#documentationMIT

Acreadiness Assess

Run the AgentRC readiness assessment on the current repository and produce a static HTML dashboard at reports/index.html. Wraps `npx github:microsoft/agentrc readiness` and hands off rendering to the @ai-readiness-reporter custom agent. Supports policies (--policy) for org-specific scoring. Use when asked to assess, audit, or score the AI readiness of a repo.

#github-copilot#planningMIT

Acreadiness Generate Instructions

Generate tailored AI agent instruction files via AgentRC instructions command. Produces .github/copilot-instructions.md (default, recommended for Copilot in VS Code) plus optional per-area .instructions.md files with applyTo globs for monorepos. Use after running /acreadiness-assess to close gaps in the AI Tooling pillar.

#github-copilot#skillMIT

Acreadiness Policy

Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.

#github-copilot#planningMIT