Skip to content
All Skills

Dse Loop

Autonomous design space exploration loop for computer architecture and EDA. Runs a program, analyzes results, tunes parameters, and iterates until objective is met or timeout. Use when user says \"DSE\", \"design space exploration\", \"sweep parameters\", \"optimize\", \"find best config\", or wants iterative parameter tuning.

Science & Simulation|v1|Updated 7/14/2026|GitHub source
MCP get_skill({ skillId: "dse-loop-4f129117" })

Use this skill with your agent

Create a free account and connect via MCP

Get Started Free
# DSE Loop: Autonomous Design Space Exploration

Autonomously explore a design space: run → analyze → pick next parameters → repeat, until the objective is met or timeout is reached. Designed for computer architecture and EDA problems.

## Context: $ARGUMENTS

## Safety Rules — READ FIRST

**NEVER do any of the following:**
- `sudo` anything
- `rm -rf`, `rm -r`, or any recursive deletion
- `rm` any file you did not create in this session
- Overwrite existing source files without reading them first
- `git push`, `git reset --hard`, or any destructive git operation
- Kill processes you did not start

**If a step requires any of the above, STOP and report to the user.**

## Constants (override via $ARGUMENTS)

| Constant | Default | Description |
|----------|---------|-------------|
| `TIMEOUT` | 2h | Total wall-clock budget. Stop exploring after this. |
| `MAX_ITERATIONS` | 50 | Hard cap on number of design points evaluated. |
| `PATIENCE` | 10 | Stop early if no improvement for this many consecutive iterations. |
| `OBJECTIVE` | minimize | `minimize` or `maximize` the target metric. |

Override inline: `/dse-loop "task desc — timeout: 4h, max_iterations: 100, patience: 15"`

## Typical Use Cases

| Problem | Program | Parameters | Objective |
|---------|---------|-----------|-----------|
| Microarch DSE | gem5 simulation | cache size, assoc, pipeline width, ROB size, branch predictor | maximize IPC or minimize area×delay |
| Synthesis tuning | yosys/DC script | optimization passes, target freq, effort level | minimize area at timing closure |
| RTL parameterization | verilator sim | data width, FIFO depth, pipeline stages, buffer sizes | meet throughput target at min area |
| Compiler flags | gcc/llvm build + benchmark | -O levels, unroll factor, vectorization, scheduling | minimize runtime or code size |
| Placement/routing | openroad/innovus | utilization, aspect ratio, layer config | minimize wirelength / timing |
| Formal verification | abc/sby | bound depth, engine, timeout per property | maximize coverage in time budget |
| Memory subsystem | cacti / ramulator | bank count, row buffer policy, scheduling | optimize bandwidth/energy |

## Workflow

### Phase 0: Parse Task & Setup

1. **Parse $ARGUMENTS** to extract:
   - **Program**: what to run (command, script, or Makefile target)
   - **Parameter space**: which knobs to tune and their ranges/options (may be incomplete — see step 2)
   - **Objective metric**: what to optimize (and how to extract it from output)
   - **Constraints**: hard limits that must not be violated (e.g., timing must close)
   - **Timeout**: wall-clock budget
   - **Success criteria**: when is the result "good enough" to stop early?

2. **Infer missing parameter ranges** — If the user provides parameter names but NOT ranges/options, you MUST infer them before exploring:

   a. **Read the source code** — search for the parameter names in the codebase:
      - Look for argparse/click definitions, config files, Makefile variables, module parameters, `#define`, `parameter` (SystemVerilog), `localparam`, etc.
      - Extract defaults, types, and any comments hinting at valid values

   b. **Apply domain knowledge** to set reasonable ranges:
      | Parameter type | Inference strategy |
      |---------------|-------------------|
      | Cache/memory sizes | Powers of 2, typically 1KB–16MB |
      | Associativity | Powers of 2: 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 |
      | Pipeline width / issue width | Small integers: 1, 2, 4, 8 |
      | Buffer/queue/FIFO depth | Powers of 2: 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 |
      | Clock period / frequency | Based on technology node; try ±50% from default |
      | Bound depth (BMC/formal) | Geometric: 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 |
      | Timeout values | Geometric: 10s, 30s, 60s, 120s, 300s |
      | Boolean/enum flags | Enumerate all options found in source |
      | Continuous (learning rate, threshold) | Log-scale sweep: 5 points spanning 2 orders of magnitude around default |
      | Integer counts (threads, cores) | Linear: from 1 to hardware max |

   c. **Start conservative** — begin with 3-5 values per parameter. Expand range later if the best result is at a boundary.

   d. **Log inferred ranges** — write the inferred parameter space to `dse_results/inferred_params.md` so the user can review:
      ```markdown
      # Inferred Parameter Space

      | Parameter | Source | Default | Inferred Range | Reasoning |
      |-----------|--------|---------|---------------|-----------|
      | CACHE_SIZE | config.py:42 | 32768 | [8192, 16384, 32768, 65536, 131072] | powers of 2, ±2x from default |
      | ASSOC | config.py:43 | 4 | [1, 2, 4, 8] | standard associativities |
      | BMC_DEPTH | run_bmc.py:15 | 10 | [5, 10, 20, 50] | geometric, common BMC depths |
      ```

   e. **Boundary expansion** — during the search, if the best result is at the min or max of a range, automatically extend that range by one step in that direction (but log the extension).

3. **Read the project** to understand:
   - How to run the program
   - Where results are produced (stdout, log files, reports)
   - How to parse the objective metric from output
   - Current/baseline configuration (if any)

4. **Create working directory**: `dse_results/` in project root
   - `dse_results/dse_log.csv` — one row per design point
   - `dse_results/DSE_REPORT.md` — final report
   - `dse_results/DSE_STATE.json` — state for recovery
   - `dse_results/inferred_params.md` — inferred parameter space (if ranges were not provided)
   - `dse_results/configs/` — config files for each run
   - `dse_results/outputs/` — raw output for each run

5. **Write a parameter extraction script** (`dse_results/parse_result.py` or similar) that takes a run's output and returns the objective metric as a number. Test it on a baseline run first.

6. **Run baseline** (iteration 0): run the program with default/current parameters. Record the baseline metric. This is the point to beat.

### Phase 1: Initial Exploration

**Goal**: Quickly survey the space to understand which parameters matter most.

**Strategy**: Latin Hypercube Sampling or structured sweep of key parameters.

1. Pick 5-10 diverse design points that span the parameter ranges
2. Run them (in parallel if independent, via background processes or sequential)
3. Record all results in `dse_log.csv`:
   ```
   iteration,param1,param2,...,metric,constraint_met,timestamp,notes
   0,default,default,...,baseline_val,yes,2026-03-13T10:00:00,baseline
   1,val1a,val2a,...,result1,yes,2026-03-13T10:05:00,initial sweep
   ...
   ```
4. Analyze: which parameters have the most impact on the objective?
5. Narrow the search to the most sensitive parameters

### Phase 2: Directed Search

**Goal**: Converge toward the optimum by making informed choices.

**Strategy**: Adaptive — pick the approach that fits the problem:

- **Few parameters (≤3)**: Fine-grained grid search around the best region from Phase 1
- **Many parameters (>3)**: Coordinate descent — optimize one parameter at a time, holding others at current best
- **Binary/categorical params**: Enumerate promising combinations
- **Continuous params**: Binary search or golden section between best neighbors
- **Multi-objective**: Track Pareto frontier, explore along the front

For each iteration:

1. **Select next design point** based on results so far:
   - Look at the trend: which direction improves the metric?
   - Avoid re-running configurations already evaluated
   - Balance exploration (untested regions) vs exploitation (near current best)

2. **Modify parameters**: edit config file, command-line args, or source constants

3. **Run the program**: execute and capture output

4. **Parse results**: extract the objective metric and check constraints

5. **Log to `dse_log.csv`**: append the new row

6. **Check stopping conditions**:
   - Timeout reached? → stop
   - Max iterations reached? → stop
   - Patience exhausted (no improvement in N iterations)? → stop
   - Success criteria met (metric is "good enough")? → stop
   - Constraint violation pattern detected? → adjust search bounds

7. **Update `DSE_STATE.json`**:
   ```json
   {
     "iteration": 15,
     "status": "in_progress",
     "best_metric": 1.23,
     "best_params": {"cache_size": 32768, "assoc": 4, "pipeline_width": 2},
     "total_iterations": 15,
     "start_time": "2026-03-13T10:00:00",
     "timeout": "2h",
     "patience_counter": 3
   }
   ```

8. **Decide next step** → back to step 1

### Phase 3: Refinement (if time allows)

If the search converged and there's still time budget:

1. **Local perturbation**: try ±1 step on each parameter from the best point
2. **Sensitivity analysis**: which parameters can be relaxed without hurting the metric?
3. **Constraint boundary**: if a constraint is nearly binding, explore near-feasible points

### Phase 4: Report

Write `dse_results/DSE_REPORT.md`:

```markdown
# Design Space Exploration Report

**Task**: [description]
**Date**: [start] → [end]
**Total iterations**: N
**Wall-clock time**: X hours Y minutes

## Objective
- **Metric**: [what was optimized]
- **Direction**: minimize / maximize
- **Baseline**: [value]
- **Best found**: [value] ([improvement]% better than baseline)

## Best Configuration
| Parameter | Baseline | Best |
|-----------|----------|------|
| param1    | default  | best_val |
| param2    | default  | best_val |
| ...       | ...      | ... |

## Search Trajectory
| Iteration | param1 | param2 | ... | Metric | Notes |
|-----------|--------|--------|-----|--------|-------|
| 0 (baseline) | ... | ... | ... | ... | baseline |
| 1 | ... | ... | ... | ... | initial sweep |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |
| N (best) | ... | ... | ... | ... | ★ best |

## Parameter Sensitivity
- **param1**: [high/medium/low impact] — [brief explanation]
- **param2**: [high/medium/low impact] — [brief explanation]

## Pareto Frontier (if multi-objective)
[Table or description of non-dominated points]

## Stopping Reason
[timeout / max_iterations / patience / success_criteria_met]

## Recommendations
- [actionable insights from the exploration]
- [which parameters matter most]
- [suggested follow-up explorations]
```

Also generate a summary plot if matplotlib is available:
- Convergence curve (metric vs iteration)
- Parameter sensitivity bar chart
- Pareto frontier scatter (if multi-objective)

## State Recovery

If the context window compacts mid-run, the loop recovers from `DSE_STATE.json` + `dse_log.csv`:

1. Read `DSE_STATE.json` for current iteration, best params, patience counter
2. Read `dse_log.csv` for full history
3. Resume from next iteration

## Key Rules

- Work AUTONOMOUSLY — do not ask the user for permission at each iteration
- **Every run must be logged** — even failed runs, constraint violations, errors. The log is the ground truth.
- **Never re-run an identical configuration** — check `dse_log.csv` before each run
- **Respect the timeout** — check elapsed time before starting a new iteration. If the next run is likely to exceed the timeout, stop and report.
- **Parse metrics programmatically** — write a parsing script, don't eyeball logs
- **Keep raw outputs** — save each run's full output in `dse_results/outputs/iter_N/`
- **Constraint violations are not improvements** — a design point that violates constraints is never "best", regardless of the metric
- If a run crashes, log the error, skip that point, and continue with the next
- If the same crash repeats 3 times with different configs, stop and report the issue

## Example Invocations

```
# Minimal — just name the parameters, let the agent figure out ranges
/dse-loop "Run gem5 mcf benchmark. Tune: L1D_SIZE, L2_SIZE, ROB_ENTRIES. Objective: maximize IPC. Timeout: 3h"

# Partial — some ranges given, some not
/dse-loop "Run make synth. Tune: CLOCK_PERIOD [5ns, 4ns, 3ns, 2ns], FLATTEN, ABC_SCRIPT. Objective: minimize area at timing closure. Timeout: 1h"

# Fully specified — explicit ranges for everything
/dse-loop "Simulate processor with FIFO_DEPTH [4,8,16,32], ISSUE_WIDTH [1,2,4], PREFETCH [on,off]. Run: make sim. Objective: max throughput/area. Timeout: 2h"

# Real-world: PDAG-SFA formal verification tuning
/dse-loop "Run python run_bmc.py. Tune: BMC_DEPTH, ENGINE, TIMEOUT_PER_PROP. Objective: maximize properties proved. Timeout: 2h"
```
#broad-capability#wanshuiyin-aris#ml-research#autonomous#optimization

Related Skills

More skills in Science & Simulation

Adaptyv

Cloud laboratory platform for automated protein testing and validation. Use when designing proteins and needing experimental validation including binding assays, expression testing, thermostability measurements, enzyme activity assays, or protein sequence optimization. Also use for submitting experiments via API, tracking experiment status, downloading results, optimizing protein sequences for better expression using computational tools (NetSolP, SoluProt, SolubleMPNN, ESM), or managing protein design workflows with wet-lab validation.

#broad-capability#creativeApache-2.0

AI Analyzer

AI驱动的综合健康分析系统,整合多维度健康数据、识别异常模式、预测健康风险、提供个性化建议。支持智能问答和AI健康报告生成。

#work-life#productivityMIT

Ansys Simulation

Automate ANSYS Fluent CFD simulations via Python scripting and journal files

#broad-capability#engineeringMIT

Astropy

Comprehensive Python library for astronomy and astrophysics. This skill should be used when working with astronomical data including celestial coordinates, physical units, FITS files, cosmological calculations, time systems, tables, world coordinate systems (WCS), and astronomical data analysis. Use when tasks involve coordinate transformations, unit conversions, FITS file manipulation, cosmological distance calculations, time scale conversions, or astronomical data processing.

#broad-capability#creativeApache-2.0

Bioservices

Unified Python interface to 40+ bioinformatics services. Use when querying multiple databases (UniProt, KEGG, ChEMBL, Reactome) in a single workflow with consistent API. Best for cross-database analysis, ID mapping across services. For quick single-database lookups use gget; for sequence/file manipulation use biopython.

#k-dense-ai-claude-scientific-skills#bioinformaticsMIT

Bom

BOM (Bill of Materials) management for electronics projects — the primary orchestrator skill that coordinates DigiKey, Mouser, LCSC, element14, JLCPCB, PCBWay, and KiCad skills into a unified workflow. Create, update, and maintain BOMs with part numbers, costs, quantities stored as KiCad symbol properties. ALWAYS trigger this skill for any task involving component sourcing, pricing, ordering, distributor searches, BOM export, or fabrication preparation — even if the user names a specific distributor or fab house (e.g. "search DigiKey for...", "generate JLCPCB BOM", "order from Mouser"). This skill decides which distributor/fab skills to invoke and in what order. Also trigger on phrases like "what parts do I need", "order components", "how much will this cost", "export for JLCPCB", "find parts for this board", "cost estimate", "compare pricing", or "check stock".

#kicad#electronicsMIT